News, Commentary, Humor With Thomas Robb and Rachel Pendergraft
UPDATED EVERY WEEK
World Peace Anyone?
January 27th, 2012 | 
Author: Separation is in Everyone’s Best Interest
What is the most striking aspect of the image to the left? Is it the lovely hues of blue that are used. Maybe your eyes go straight to the dove – an often used image of peace with it’s origin in the Bible. Maybe the slogan of, “Peace Nowwww” is what sticks with you. To me the most striking part of this image is the rainbow.
The multi colored rainbow is used many times by peace advocates to advance their vision of world peace through racial diversity. I agree. The contrasting vibrant colors of the rainbow do represent a type of racial harmony. But here is the kicker that never seems to sink in. The colors are separate. In fact, the only reason you can see the different colors of the rainbow is for the exact reason that the colors are unique. This is not a gray rainbow. There is no such thing as a gray rainbow. To integrate or mix the colors of the rainbow would mean that the very essence that is trying to be achieved (diversity) no longer exists.
The concept of diversity is so misunderstood that a large portion of the population actually believes a mixture of all racial groups will mean more diversity when the opposite is the true result. It is so mind boggling simple that a very small child can understand it – that is until his idea is “corrected” by social engineers who supposedly know better.
W e have said it over and over again. We have advocated this concept for years. Separation works. While Europe has seen violence and bloodshed in the past due to the clashing of cultures, the brilliance of our founding fathers and by Godly providence, America was enshrouded by a sense of cooperation between different families of the same racial group.
Whether they be English, German, Italian, Russian, French, Irish, or one of the many other racially white, but ethnically diverse cultures, they all originated from the same racial people group. Though differing in language, dress, dance, food, or custom, their nature was the same.
Out of this group of people came the concept of self-government and our constitutional republic. Our values and morals were the same. And while there were differences of opinion in regard to Christian doctrine, they were Christian none-the-less and adhered to the basic tenants of the Christian faith. Their view of America was a nation open freely to all nationalities of white people (citizenship was restricted to white people) and men and women were recognized to have the freedom to belong to the Christian denomination of their choice. (the true intention of the First Amendment)
Slavery should never have been an option and our people have suffered because of it. But also, the descendants of the 400,000 Africans brought here as slaves still labor under the idea that white Americans are out to get them. And once again, racial tension seeps to the surface.
This was the purpose behind the Back to Africa movement supported by Abraham Lincoln and also black nationalist Marcus Garvey. Thomas Jefferson was an advocate of racial separation (too bad his quote was edited when carved in stone at the Jefferson Memorial in D.C.)
And there were women such as Clare Luce Boothe (her husband was the founder of Time, Fortune, Life, and Sports Illustrated magazines) she wrote for Vogue and Vanity Fair, was an U.S. Ambassador to Italy and Brazil, was a Broadway playright with numerous credits, was a Congresswoman, served during Reagan’s term on the President’s Foregin Advisory Board, was named Woman of the Century, received the U.S. Medal of Honor, was an avowed Christian and warned that non-white immigration would destroy the U.S. (Note: I include Booth’s credentials because the media has implied that the concept of racial separation is an idea purported by evil white men. When in fact it is an idea cherished by America’s white majority – male and female – until quite recently and by those of all economic and educational backgrounds)
To truly be free, you must have your own space, to succeed or fail on your own, to make your own decisions.
The institution of slavery broke down the hegemony of our nation and created a crisis that we are still having to grapple with. Separation is a virtuous idea that must be given serious contemplation once again. Even cultures within a racial group can clash on occasion – more so when completely different racial groups are forced together through government edict.
The genetic difference between the races is so expansive that friction is always the result. Social engineers have attempted to solve the problem by discrediting solid scientific and historic evidence that the racial groups are so unique. By ignoring what is generally known and substituting in its place a new age cultural phenomena by which white people are relegated to a position void of appreciation for their own culture, whites are increasingly adopting the culture of non-white racial groups. This unnatural and engineered assimilation of whites and non-whites is leading toward the genocide of our people.
It is only fair that all people groups have their own nation, create their own laws and government, and control their own destiny. I don’t care about controlling what happens in India or China. And except for the genocide of whites in South Africa and Zimbabwe (former white nations without a sizable native presence until whites brought prosperity) I think the nations of Africa should be free to solve their own problems.
Weakness cannot be overcome by having some other nation solve your problems – just like you can’t build muscle by watching someone else lift weights. Weak nations grow strong and prosper by doing it themselves. Still, who are we to say that what is normal to us is normal to them. Let them create and enjoy their own culture. It is called self-determination.
Relative peace can be had by recognizing the right of people to their own land and government. That is a right that should be afforded to white people as well. It is fair to all. Geographic separation is the only solution to lasting peace and conflict resolution. Intelligent people of all racial families should give it serious consideration.
It isn’t about hate. It is about common sense and human dignity. It is about the preservation of unique people groups as God designed. Many people of different racial backgrounds agree with this. It is about time that white people learn to love each other without feeling that a trip to a counselor is in order.
There is nothing wrong with advocating for and loving your race. Separation will reduce the chaos, anxiety, and suspicion that ultimately arises through integration. And as a white person filled with compassion for my own people, but also empathetic to the feelings of others, I must stay true to the legacy of my own race. Knowing that our people are so few in number on a global perspective I know that separation is not only good for all races, but it is also good for my race…for my race is the race that faces genocide on a mass scale through the engineered reduction of the white population.
So work for your own people, but allow us to work for our people. If the world can work together to save an endanged bird, whale, or insect, doesn’t it make sense to save an entire group of people? I think it does. But maybe I just have too big of a heart and care too much.
Posted in 
Greed or Environment: What’s Behind Obama’s Veto of Pipeline?
What was most likely behind Obama’s veto of an oil pipeline from Canada and North Dakota into the interior U.S.? Those who have a love for nature and are concerned about the environment might believe it was his sensitivity to these issues, but perhaps political favors was the underlying motive after all.
Check this out from Investor’s Business Daily
Killing the Keystone XL pipeline may help one of the world’s richest men get richer. North Dakota’s booming oil fields will now grow more dependent on a railroad the president’s economic guru just bought.
Stop us if you see a pattern here. About the time George Soros — Hungarian billionaire and key donor to leftist groups and the Democratic Party — invested heavily in the stock of the state-run Brazilian oil company Petrobras, President Obama was curbing U.S. offshore oil production and the U.S. Export-Import Bank announced a $2 billion loan to Petrobras to finance deep-water drilling off the pristine beaches of Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.
As he was imposing curbs and moratoria on U.S. offshore drillers, President Obama wished the Brazilians well in the hope we would someday be Brazil’s best oil customer.
Apparently, oil tankers coming from Brazil are better and safer than a pipeline from Canada, whose best customer we will not be if they ship their tar sands oil to China instead.
Interestingly, another billionaire, Obama economic inspiration Warren Buffett, stands to benefit from the Keystone XL pipeline delay.
As oil production ramps up in the Bakken fields of North Dakota, plans to use the pipeline to transport it have been dashed.
As a result, North Dakota’s booming oil producers will have to rely even more on the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad, which Buffett just bought, to ship it to refineries.
Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway has agreed to buy Burlington Northern Santa Fe in a deal valuing the railroad at $34 billion. Berkshire Hathaway already owns about 22% of Burlington Northern, and will pay $100 a share in cash and stock for the rest of the company.
Black Teens Who Beat 14 Year old White Girl Won’t Be charged with a Hate Crime
After a 14 year old white girl was brutally attacked by a black mob of teen girls, prosecutors have decided not to charge the assailants with a hate crime. Many in the community are outraged and it was the topic of at least one class at PSU.
The professor (an “expert” on hate crimes) tells the class that it probably doesn’t fit the criteria for a hate crime charge because although their were numerous racial slurs toward the white girl, her being white was not the motive. One student summarizes by saying that the racial slurs were said after the attack had already begun, so obviously it wasn’t the motive.
Of course, they fail to take into consideration that the aggressive black girls said that they felt the white girl had an attitude. This seems to count toward perceived bias on their part. Because the girl was white, they felt that she had an attitude. After all, don’t all white people have an “attitude?” Whites living in heavily mixed communities know that even looking at some non-whites the wrong way is enough to warrant a beat down – according to non-white racial tribal street code.
Click Here http://kkk.bz/?p=2599 for the related video and watch the updated story below
Man Justified in Shooting Teen Robbers
WFMZ
A 65-year-old man was justified in shooting two of three teenagers who were attempting to rob him as he rode his bicycle along a popular river trail Wednesday morning, authorities announced Thursday.
{snip}
The teens knocked the man off his bicycle and onto the ground in their third random robbery attempt in about an hour’s time, said Berks County District Attorney John Adams.
Two of the teens were assaulting the man when he pulled out a gun and shot them, police said.
The man is licensed to carry a gun, said Adams, who noted that the man told investigators he feared for his life. Adams said the man had no choice but to shoot.
One of the alleged assailants, Julius Johnson, 16, a student in the Reading School District who skipped school Wednesday, died at the scene of a gunshot wound to the chest, officials said.
{snip}
Another teen, a 15-year-old student in the Governor Mifflin School District, was also shot and taken to a hospital for surgery. {snip}
The third teen, a 16-year-old boy, was uninjured and committed to the county’s Youth Detention Center.
Gingrich Opens Door for Illegal Immigrants
Seth McLaughlin, Washington Times
Under close questioning by Univision’s political host, Jorge Ramos, Mr. Gingrich said he would grant quick citizenship rights to illegal immigrants who join the military or to those who have been in the U.S. between 20 and 25 years. He said the rest of the estimated 11 million should be given access to a guest-worker program.
“With most of them? I would urge them to get a guest-worker permit,” he said, calling for a substantial rewrite of immigration laws that would cancel existing penalties and instead let illegal immigrants stay.
But his campaign said it was unclear whether at the end of that guest-worker period the immigrants would be allowed to stay and gain citizenship, essentially jumping the legal immigration line, or whether they would be required to return home.
“Undetermined,” Gingrich spokesman R.C. Hammond told The Washington Times.
{snip}
If the guest workers would be required to go home, then Mr. Gingrich‘s position is similar to that of Republican primary rival Mitt Romney, who also has called for a transition period for illegal immigrants, during which they could stay and work while they get their affairs in order, but they would eventually have to go home.
If Mr. Gingrich envisions a path to citizenship for guest workers, then his plan is closer to President Obama‘s, who has called for a chance for nearly all illegal immigrants to become citizens at the end of a multistep process.
{snip}
Immigration is a major issue but not the only one for Hispanic Republicans in Florida. Many voters are Cuban and enjoy special carve-outs in immigration law, though they do have sympathy for fellow Hispanics who are more intimately touched by illegal immigration. Indeed, many Cuban-American Republican leaders support passage of the Dream Act to legalize illegal-immigrant young adults who are going to college or joining the military.
{snip}
In Florida on Wednesday, Mr. Gingrich ridiculed Mr. Romney‘s call for “self-deportation,” saying the approach lacks “humanity” and arguing that it is unrealistic for him to think stronger enforcement of the nation’s laws will persuade illegal immigrants to leave the nation voluntarily.
“For Romney to believe that somebody’s grandmother is going to be so cut off she is going to self-deport—this is an Obama-level fantasy,” he said.
Mr. Romney countered later in the day by saying Mr. Gingrich was trying to pander to Hispanic voters and hide the fact he, himself, used to argue that self-deportation was the proper solution to illegal immigration.
{snip}
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jan/25/romney-gingrich-flip-flopper-self-deportation/
Facts About the Tuskegee Airmen
From: Bob Powell
This letter was not written for publication, but to enlighten you and your staff about some of the errors and misleading information you continue to publish, Perhaps it should be published to set your readers straight.
As a WWII Historian and former 8th AF fighter pilot flying 87 missions over Europe during WWII, I am dedicated to factual reporting about the air war in Europe and aviation in general, and I take issue with the media (and not with just AJC) continuing to publish untrue and/or misleading statements about the Tuskegee Airmen (T/A). Although I have great respect for the pilots and achievements of this WWII Fighter Group, I do not appreciate the continuing repetition of myths and untruths about their military record, the latest example in the obit on Lt. Col Charles Dryden in today’s paper, repeating the same errors which appeared in his obit story a few days ago.
For more than 60 years the myth that they “never lost a bomber they were escorting to an enemy fighter,” was their primary claim to fame!
Then, several months ago, their historian , William E. Holten, announced that his research proved that this was not true, that they had, indeed, lost some 25 bombers to enemy fighters. This myth still gets published occasionally, but far less frequently since he made this disclosure, thank goodness. Lies told often enough tend to become truths in the minds of many. However, it now seems to have been replaced by another false claim, i.e. that the Tuskegee Airmen flew more than 15,000 combat missions. ALSO NOT TRUE!
Their own official records indicate that the T/A only flew 311 missions. Their so-called 15,000 “missions” were actually 15,000 ”sorties.” Apparently, none of your reporters know the difference between a “mission” and a “sortie,” so let me define these for you and them. Combat Mission is an assigned flight to accomplish a military objective. This can be flown by one pilot or a squadron or group of pilots flying together. It is recorded as one mission. Combat Sortie. When, for example, 48 or 64 pilots fly together on a combat mission it is recorded as 48 or 64 combat sorties.
The T/A did not fly 15,000+ combat missions, as stated in your articles about the demise of Col. Charles Dryden. They flew 15,000+ “sorties.” To have flown that many “missions” during the time they were in combat in the MTO, they would have had to fly about 25 missions a day every day they were in combat. Do the math. That’s one mission every hour, every day they were in combat. Impossible! Weather alone would have prevented this, not to mention the problem of keeping all of their aircraft flyable every day over that period of time.
FACT: Their official records indicate they flew only 311 missions, a far cry from 15,000 claimed. Please advise your reporters of the difference between a mission and a sortie so that another T/A myth is not appearing in every mention this Fighter group.
The Dryden story also stated that the 99th Squadron of the T/A was “the most successful squadron in American history.” NOT SO! It would be more correct to say they have been the most publicized squadron in American history, however, thanks to a fully-paid public relations staff in Washington, D.C., the only such office of any military unit other than the U.S. Army, Navy, Marines and Coast Guard.
Although I do not have complete combat statistics on all the fighter groups flying out of Africa and Italy (the MTO), I do have the stats on all of the 16 fighter groups flying in the Eighth Air Force over western Europe. And, when these records are compared, the Tuskegee Airmen rank at the bottom of the list despite the fact that they had four squadrons to only three for the 8th AF groups. FYI, and one of the reasons the T/A exploit their 15,000+ sorties (which they call missions) is that on a normal mission they would put up 64 fighters compared to only 48 for the 8th AF groups . And, since they did mostly ground support missions rather than bomber escort missions, the average length of their missions was about half that of the time in the air flown by the 8th AF fighters. Regarding the above mentioned stats, I would be delighted to provide these for your information if requested.
Another gross error in your first story on Colonel Dryden is that the implication that he was, individually, awarded the Congressional Gold Medal recently. ALSO NOT TRUE. Through the efforts of the New York Senator, this medal was awarded to the Tuskegee Airmen, authorizing all Tuskegee Airman to receive this award. It was not awarded for individual achievements, as implied, but for the role played by the T/A in breaking the color ban for pilots, a civil rights accomplishment, not for their military achievements.
Had this award been given for their military achievements alone, it should also have been awarded to each and every other fighter group in WWII whose records exceeded those of the Tuskegee Airmen. In my opinion, this was a “political award” instead of a military award.
No other bomber or fighter units have been awarded this Medal, only Unit Citations. These are facts. Check them out, and here’s to more factual reporting and a better AJC.
Most sincerely,
Robert H. Powell, Jr.
Author/Editor/Historian/Pilot
352nd Fighter Group
1545 Rainier Falls Dr.
Atlanta, GA 30329
http://radioatwar.net/2012/01/24/thanks-again-bill.aspx?ref=rss
El Taco es Problemo
This taco story that is making the news rounds is the dumbest story to come out in weeks. Massachusetts has become a haven for illegal aliens, and increasingly municipal and state leaders are encouraging the formation of ‘sanctuary cities.’ These are cities which have made it their official policy to allow illegal aliens (criminals by law) to remain without any interference.
These illegal aliens have a high rate of drunk driving incidences, criminal trespass, and fraud. They are a drain on the economy and cause a raise in the unemployment rate. Some claim they begin businesses, but new hires are most often other illegal aliens.
In New Haven, the mayor actually announced in December that he wants to extend voting rights to illegal aliens. He already was integral in the use of ID cards – which somehow is suppose to make them more legal.
So with the state having so many problems with illegal aliens, it is incredibly ironic that the the fuss in the news is not about that problem, but rather the problem of racist policy, racist cops, and racist comments….all alleged, of course.
East Hartford Mayor Joseph Maturo made a joke about eating tacos to help the Latino community and now he has apologized and will no doubt work even harder on behalf of the Latino community. This is absurd. It is just another example of the most ridiculous attempts made to silence anyone from saying anything in opposition to illegal immigration. Maturo is not an enemy of the Latino community – as most aren’t.
But the point that many want to make is that you better not say one single word that could even be construed as insensitive or you are going to become a target. Silence is what they want. And Maturo is just being used as an example. Better not make a taco joke and better yet, never ever object to the take over of our country or even imply that that is what is happening.
Check out the article below:
Connecticut Mayor Joseph Maturo Slammed for ‘racist’ tacos comment
DailyMail
The ‘taco’ comment came as Mr Maturo was being interviewed by New York’s WPIX-TV about alleged anti-Hispanic bias in East Haven and the subject of a federal civil rights probe that was launched in 2009.
The four officers arrested Tuesday are charged with depriving the civil rights of Latinos and their supporters, including by unlawfully searching Latino businesses and intimidating people who tried to investigate or report alleged misconduct.
-snip-
Mr Maturo was interviewed on video Tuesday by reporter Mario Diaz, who asked, ‘What are you doing for the Latino community today?’
Mr Maturo’s response: ‘I might have tacos when I go home; I’m not quite sure yet.’
Mr Diaz then said: ‘You realize that’s not really the comment to say right now, you “might have tacos tonight”?’
Growing increasingly angry, the mayor added he does not believe the anti-Latino bias allegations are ‘a systemic problem within our police department or within our community’ and told Mr Diaz to ‘go for it, take your best shot’ to make the ‘taco’ comment seem to imply something he did not intend.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2091852/Connecticut-Mayor-Joseph-Maturo-slammed-racist-tacos-comment.html#ixzz1kZiZ79jh
Jan Brewer Tells Greta About Obama Confrontation
Governor Jan Brewer discussed her confrontation with Obama today at the Phoenix airport. Brewer told Greta Van Susteren that Obama ambushed her when he got off the plane about a book she wrote. This upset her and that is when she poked her finger at his chest. Brewer said that Obama walked away from her in mid-sentence.
“I don’t know why he was surprised by my book and he’s very thin skinned in regards to it.”
4 Quarterly Issues PLUS 8 Special Mailings of Robb's Victory Report! $20.00
