Rupert Murdoch (Jewish descent), owner of News Corps (parent company to Wall Street Journal, Fox News, New York Post, Chicago Sun Times, Village Voice, New York Magazine, and numerous radio stations, international newspapers, websites, and 20th Century Fox Film company) is quite upset that Eric Cantor (Jewish) lost the Republican primary and hopes it doesn’t deter Congress from immigration reform. As another member of the wealthy ruling elite – tied to big business, nothing would make him happier than millions of new immigrant workers. Depressed wages and racial turmoil caused by forced integration sets the course for the accumulation of wealth by a few.
His assertion that the majority of immigrants (almost all are non-white) create businesses that benefit the rest of the country is absurd. Native whites also desire business ownership but do not have the same advantages and government assistance. The game is fixed for the immigrants to get special treatment such as preference at the Small Business Administration, Minority Prequalification Programs, Supplier Diversity Programs,The National Minority Supplier Development Council, The Minority Business Development Agency, Office of Refugee Resettlement,US Pan Asian American Chamber of Commerce and a multitude of other programs/organizations designed for the empowerment of non-whites and destruction of Whites.
Furthermore, it is well established that non-white immigrant groups view the founders of the U.S. as racist pigs. They desire to use the benevolence of the native whites, the economic framework of the U.S., and the scheming manipulation of big business as a tool to remake this country into a multi-racial mecca that unites against Western Christian civilization and the U.S. that was its crowning achievement – a bastion for white Christian families.
Murdoch, by promoting Fox as an alternate to liberal thinking, is able to manipulate its conservative, mostly white, viewer base toward the abandonment of racial loyalty. His prerogative is wealth in the guise of fiscal conservatism while bashing any allegiance to white heritage.
He is a perfect example of an elitist. Whether liberal or conservative their only concern is wealth.
Immigration Reform Can’t Wait
When I learned that House Majority Leader Eric Cantor had lost his Republican primary, my heart sank. Not simply because I think he is an intelligent and talented member of Congress, or because I worry about the future of the Republican Party.
Like others who want comprehensive immigration reform, I worried that Mr. Cantor’s loss would be misconstrued and make Congress reluctant to tackle this urgent need. That would be the wrong lesson and an undesirable national consequence of this single, local election result.
People are looking for leadership–those who stand for something and offer a vision for how to take America forward and keep our nation economically competitive. One of the most immediate ways to revitalize our economy is by passing immigration reform.
Is the idea of immigration reform complicated by the fact that some immigrants went outside the legal system to be here? Yes. It is complicated even more by the fear some Americans have, quite naturally, of how changing populations might also change our culture, communities and economic circumstances.
Well, of course immigration means change. Immigrants enrich our culture and add to our economic prosperity.
Do Americans really wish Google, eBay, Pfizer, or Home Depot were headquartered in Eastern Europe or China instead of America? Whether it’s a high-profile tech company or a small business employing just 10 people, 28% of all new American businesses started in 2011 were founded by immigrants. Those are entrepreneurial people we want to continue to attract to our economy.
I don’t believe that people come to America to sit on their hands. The vast majority of America’s immigrants are hardworking, family-minded individuals with strong values. They are drawn here from many different places by a common belief that this is still the land of opportunity for those willing to work hard.
We need to give those individuals who are already here–after they have passed checks to ensure they are not dangerous criminals–a path to citizenship so they can pay their full taxes, be counted, and become more productive members of our community.
Next, we need to do away with the cap on H-1B visas, which is arbitrary and results in U.S. companies struggling to find the high-skill workers they need to continue growing. We already know that most of the applications for these visas are for computer programmers and engineers, where there is a shortage of qualified American candidates. But we are held back by the objections of the richly funded labor unions that mistakenly believe that if we keep innovation out of America, somehow nothing will change. They are wrong, and frankly as much to blame for our stalemate on this issue as nativists who scream about amnesty.
If we are serious about advancing our economic future and about creating job growth here in America, then we must realize that it is suicidal to suggest closing our doors to the world’s entrepreneurs, or worse, to continue with large-scale deportations.
That is not to suggest we don’t need to do a far better job securing our border. Border security should be an integral part of a comprehensive solution, and we should not dismiss the concerns of states that are struggling to deal with the consequences of ongoing illegal immigration.
Some politicians and pundits will argue that this is not the time to bring immigration reform to the congressional floor–that it will frighten an already anxious workforce and encourage more extreme candidates, especially on the right. They may be right about the short-term politics, but they are dead wrong about the long-term interests of our country.
That is why I was pleased to see Sen. Rand Paul and Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, step up their efforts to lobby for immigration reform.
President Obama has shown wise restraint despite pressure from the left to act, recognizing that a bipartisan approach on such an immense issue would be best. Remember ObamaCare?
However, if Congress fails to even try to have this important debate, the president might feel tempted to act via executive order. I hope it doesn’t get to that point, given the furious political firestorm that would result.
All the more reason, then, to recognize that the facts are on the side of reform, and democratic societies don’t advance when our elected officials act like seat-warmers.